Figure 1: Picture of a warning sign before the Jordan's Point Dam
Project Goal:
Understand how the removal of Jordan’s Point Dam changed the hydraulics of the Maury River and evaluate whether the dam removal resulted in improved channel conditions.
1. Can a HECRAS model be used to indicate whether or not a dam should be removed?
2. How will fish be impacted of the dam removal, and is it shown in HECRAS?
3. How will flooding be effected with a dam removal?
The AutoCAD Set Location tool was used to georeference the area surrounding the Maury River and Jordan’s Point Dam. A polyline was then drawn along the selected river reach to measure its length, resulting in a total reach distance of approximately 50,600 feet.
Figure 2: USGS Upstream and Downstream Sites: 02022500 and 02024000
Figure 3: The polyline on the river in AutoCAD
Figure 6: Picture of the steady flow analysis tab in HECRAS
Figure 4: Geometric Data page from HECRAS, showing the river reach that was used
Figure 5: Cross section given: used for the 27800 station in my HECRAS model
Steady flow analysis data were then added using the previously determined flow values. The downstream slope was calculated as 0.002737 based on the difference between upstream and downstream gage elevations obtained from an online elevation tool and the total reach length.
Due to limited data availability, the river reach was manually digitized in HEC-RAS. A single existing cross section from a previous Maury River project was used, and AI tools assisted with unit conversion and the development of upstream and downstream cross sections, which were then interpolated. A uniform Manning’s n of 0.03 was assumed, and cross-sectional shape was held constant along the reach due to the lack of detailed geometry data.
First, two USGS gaging stations were identified, one upstream of the dam (02022500) and one downstream (02024000). These stations were used as the upstream and downstream boundaries of the river reach in HEC-RAS. A third, closer USGS gage near the dam site (02023000) was then identified using the USGS StreamStats tool, and flow data from this gage were used to define the steady-flow inputs for the HEC-RAS analysis:
| 2018 Mean Annual Flow (cfs) |
50 Year Flood (cfs) |
100 Year Flood (cfs) | 500 Year Flood (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 509 | 30,320 | 35,900 |
51,170 |
HECRAS Analysis
Methods
Disclaimer: This website presents an educational analysis of stream and river hydraulics using HEC-RAS. The modeling is based on simplified assumptions, estimated inputs, and limited available data. All results are for academic purposes only and are not intended for design, regulatory, or implementation use.
Website created in white label responsive website builder WebWave.
Hint:
You can remove this information by activating Premium Plan